Why Did These Assholes Ruin Bitcoin Cash?

　　Bitcoin Cash (BCH) was once a beacon of hope for the cryptocurrency community, promising to bring back the original vision of Bitcoin as a decentralized, peer-to-peer electronic cash system. However, in recent years, the BCH community has been plagued by infighting and a series of controversial decisions that have led many to question why these assholes ruined Bitcoin Cash.

　　First and foremost, the BCH community's inability to reach a consensus on fundamental issues has been a major reason for its downfall. One of the most contentious issues has been the block size debate. While Bitcoin Cash was initially created to increase the block size limit to accommodate more transactions, the community has been split between those who want to continue expanding the block size and those who believe in maintaining the original Bitcoin protocol.

　　This division has led to numerous hard forks, with each fork resulting in a new version of Bitcoin Cash. The most recent fork, Bitcoin SV (BSV), was created by Craig Wright, who claims to be the real Satoshi Nakamoto. This fork has further fragmented the community and caused many to lose faith in the project.

　　Why did these assholes ruin Bitcoin Cash by causing such a rift among its members? It seems that some individuals within the community have prioritized their own interests over the greater good. Instead of working together to find a solution that would benefit the entire ecosystem, they have chosen to pursue their own agendas, leading to a toxic environment that has driven away many potential users and investors.

　　Another reason why these assholes ruined Bitcoin Cash is their tendency to ignore the lessons learned from the past. Bitcoin Cash was supposed to be a continuation of the original Bitcoin project, but instead, it has become a victim of its own hubris. The BCH community has repeatedly ignored the warnings of Bitcoin's early developers, such as Satoshi Nakamoto and Gavin Andresen, who emphasized the importance of maintaining a decentralized network.

　　One of the most controversial decisions made by the BCH community was the implementation of the Bitcoin ABC client, which was designed to increase the block size limit. While this may have seemed like a good idea at the time, it has led to a series of problems, including increased centralization and a loss of trust among users.

　　Why did these assholes ruin Bitcoin Cash by implementing a solution that has caused more harm than good? It appears that some individuals within the community have become so fixated on their own vision that they have lost sight of the original goals of Bitcoin Cash. They have chosen to ignore the warnings of those who have been involved in the project from the beginning, leading to a situation where the project is no longer recognizable as the original Bitcoin Cash.

　　In conclusion, the downfall of Bitcoin Cash can be attributed to a combination of factors, including infighting, a lack of consensus, and a tendency to ignore the lessons learned from the past. While it is difficult to pinpoint the exact reasons why these assholes ruined Bitcoin Cash, it is clear that the project has been severely damaged by the actions of a few individuals who have chosen to prioritize their own interests over the greater good. It remains to be seen whether Bitcoin Cash can recover from this crisis and return to its original vision of becoming a decentralized, peer-to-peer electronic cash system.

Like!（623）